Appeals Court Overturns Publisher Payments to Freelancers

Authored by Mark Hefflinger on November 30, 2007 - 9:53am.

New York - A federal appeals court has overturned an agreement between freelance writers and publishers over compensation for works reproduced electronically, saying that the court has no jurisdiction in the matter, The New York Times reported.

The Supreme Court ruled in 2001 that publishers must seek permission from writers before reproducing their works electronically.

A 2005 federal court settlement that awarded some $18 million to freelancers for past usage of their works was thrown out by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit yesterday.

The majority opinion said that damages could only be sought by writers who had registered their works with the U.S. Copyright Office; most of them had not.

"The decision is an outrage, and I hope it's appealable to the Supreme Court," National Writers Union president Gerard Colby told The Times.

Defendants in the suit include Thomson (NYSE: TOC), The New York Times Company (NYSE: NYT), Dow Jones (NYSE: DJ), Tribune Company (NYSE: TRB) and Reed Elsevier's (NYSE: RUK) LexisNexis.

 

Related Links:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/30/business/media/30copyright.html

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/30/business/media/30freelance.html

http://www.nwu.org



Comments

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Add image
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><br><p> <b> <i> <img> <hr>
  • Images can be added to this post.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.