Analysis: Amy Winehouse and The Benefits of Good and Bad Publicity

Authored by Robin Goad on February 12, 2008 - 8:25am.

“Camden Town is burning down” claimed Amy Winehouse during her Grammy acceptance speech and, unfortunately, parts of it actually were. The fire that ravaged through Camden Market at the weekend received a lot of coverage in the press, and as a result searches for ‘camden’ increased by 250% last week. The top two destinations for searchers were the Camden Lock Market homepage and the Camden local government page, both of which experienced a significant spike in traffic on Sunday.

UK Internet traffic to Camden Lock and Camden council homepages january february 2008 following fire chart.png

It’s interesting to look at who was going to these sites. The Camden Lock Market homepage saw the biggest increase of the two, with 30% of its traffic last week coming from the BBC News site. Nearly two thirds of visitors to the site came from outside London, nicely illustrating the national interest in the story. On the other hand, 78% of visitors to Camden council’s website were from the capital – with many concerned local residents and businesses presumably amongst the new visitors.

Local resident Winehouse had a better night than her adopted hometown of course, winning 5 Grammys despite not attending the ceremony in the Los Angeles. As you can see from the chart below, there was a notable increase in traffic to her homepage following the victories.

UK Internet traffic to Amy Winehouse homepage january february 2008 following grammy victory chart.png

However, it seems like the awards will benefit Amy Winehouse’s career more in the US than the UK. The singer is hardly lacking exposure at home, and the press coverage generated by her well documented troubles undoubtedly played a role in her album ‘Back to Black’ being the biggest selling album the UK last year. Therefore, it’s interesting to compare the traffic trends in the UK chart (above) with the American chart (below). UK traffic to her homepage spiked on Monday, but that peak was smaller than the one on 22 January caused by the Sun hosting a video of the singer allegedly taking illegal drugs. That event also caused a spike in US traffic, but this was significantly less than the spike that resulted from her Grammy victories this weekend.

US Internet traffic to Amy Winehouse homepage january february 2008 following grammys wins chart.png

What this data seems to illustrate is that, while there may be no such thing as bad publicity, the value of good and bad publicity varies based on a number of factors. In the case of Winehouse these variables include the audience (Americans vs. Brits), the product (both her album and her image), and the stage of the marketing cycle (her career is more established in the UK than the US).

Robin Goad


Robin Goad is Research Director, Hitwise UK. This piece was originally published on Hitwise analyst blog here.

Image By mikeakelly


Comments

The benefits of good and bad

The benefits of good and bad publicity? When it comes to Amy we can definitely talk and talk about bad publicity, I don't think there should benefits involved just because she is crazy enough to do drugs and never consider a drug rehab center. In this case I am starting to believe that she is doing this on purpose.

reply

Amy doesn't have a real hunger for awards (and) doesn't lust after increasingly massive success the way most singers do. That's admirable, but there is always a subconscious impulse for most voters in any field to want to give a prize to somebody who actually wants it

I doubt Amy is doing all her

I doubt Amy is doing all her masquerades just because she can draw benefits from bad publicity. Indeed, we are all familiar with her drug and alcohol stories, I could say we are more familiar with that than with her career in singing. The girl needs drug rehabilitation, too bad she is the only one unaware of that.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.