Mark Cuban: The Government’s Claims Of Insider Trading Are False

Authored by Mark Cuban on November 18, 2008 - 5:38am.

UPDATED. I wish I could say more, but I will have to leave it to this, and let the judicial process do its job.
November 17, 2008
RE: SEC Civil Action in the United States District for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division.
Mark Cuban today responded to a civil complaint filed by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission in the United States District for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division. In its complaint, the Commission charges that Mr. Cuban engaged in violations of the federal securities laws in connection with transactions in the securities of Mamma.com Inc.

This matter, which has been pending before the Commission for nearly two years, has no merit and is a product of gross abuse of prosecutorial discretion. Mr. Cuban intends to contest the allegations and to demonstrate that the Commission’s claims are infected by the misconduct of the staff of its Enforcement Division.

Mr. Cuban stated, “I am disappointed that the Commission chose to bring this case based upon its Enforcement staff’s win-at-any-cost ambitions. The staff’s process was result-oriented, facts be damned. The government’s claims are false and they will be proven to be so.”
————————————————————

Ralph C. Ferrara, Esq.

Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP

1101 New York Avenue, N.W., Suite 1100

Washington, D.C. 20005

 _______________________________

November 18, 2008

On behalf of

Mark Cuban

RE: SEC Civil Action in the United States District

for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division

The SEC knows their case centers on one telephone conversation between two individuals- 4 years ago. The SEC claims there was an agreement between these parties to the conversation to keep certain information confidential. We interviewed Guy Faure, the former CEO of Mamma.com Inc., with whom the SEC claims Mr. Cuban made an agreement. We had a court reporter transcribe the interview. There was no agreement to keep information confidential. Here is a relevant excerpt from the interview with Mr. Faure:

CHRISTOPHER CLARK :

1) Q- We spoke earlier about you were telling Mr. Cuban in words or substance : “I have confidential information for you”.

A- Right.

2) Q- Do you recall anything Mr. Cuban said in response or reply to that statement by you ?

A- No, I do not.

The SEC knows this-they have the transcript, yet they brought the case anyway. Why? Do they have a different statement from Mr. Faure ?

Why did the SEC end their multi-year investigation of Mamma.com Inc. for alleged securities laws violations days before interviewing present and former Mamma.com Inc. executives about this matter? Was the timing a coincidence? We think not.

Any inquiries respecting this release should be directed to Stephen Best at Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP (202) 346-8735.

 _______________________________________________

This piece was originally published on Mark's blog Blog Maverick and is posted on DMW with the author's permission. Mark's bio can be viewed here. The views expressed in this post are the author’s own, and do not represent the views of Digital Media Wire.

Image by quinnums

 

 

Comments

well, doesn't really matter mark...

you acted on information not available to the public. hence, insider trading. you don't have to say "yes, i understand this is confidential material" to be bound by insider trading laws, genius. if you used information that _I_ don't have, gained from the company involved, to make market decisions... that's insider trading. bluster all you want, big guy. you're not the victim here. now, go buy the cubs already and get to work!

Seems pretty clear to me

"The SEC knows their case centers on one telephone conversation between two individuals- 4 years ago. "

That's often the case with insider trading - you know, the telephone call, the tidbit of information, then the quick call to the broker. Then when the news enters the public arena it's like "Hey, I guess I was just lucky with that trade..."

Sorry Mark, on the facts so far, you deserve to lose this one.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.