Mark Cuban: The Government’s Claims Of Insider Trading Are FalseAuthored by Mark Cuban on November 18, 2008 - 5:38am.
This matter, which has been pending before the Commission for nearly two years, has no merit and is a product of gross abuse of prosecutorial discretion. Mr. Cuban intends to contest the allegations and to demonstrate that the Commission’s claims are infected by the misconduct of the staff of its Enforcement Division.
Mr. Cuban stated, “I am disappointed that the Commission chose to
bring this case based upon its Enforcement staff’s win-at-any-cost
ambitions. The staff’s process was result-oriented, facts be damned.
The government’s claims are false and they will be proven to be so.” Ralph C. Ferrara, Esq. Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP 1101 New York Avenue, N.W., Suite 1100 Washington, D.C. 20005 _______________________________ November 18, 2008 On behalf of Mark Cuban RE: SEC Civil Action in the United States District for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division The SEC knows their case centers on one telephone conversation between two individuals- 4 years ago. The SEC claims there was an agreement between these parties to the conversation to keep certain information confidential. We interviewed Guy Faure, the former CEO of Mamma.com Inc., with whom the SEC claims Mr. Cuban made an agreement. We had a court reporter transcribe the interview. There was no agreement to keep information confidential. Here is a relevant excerpt from the interview with Mr. Faure: CHRISTOPHER CLARK : 1) Q- We spoke earlier about you were telling Mr. Cuban in words or substance : “I have confidential information for you”. A- Right. 2) Q- Do you recall anything Mr. Cuban said in response or reply to that statement by you ? A- No, I do not. The SEC knows this-they have the transcript, yet they brought the case anyway. Why? Do they have a different statement from Mr. Faure ? Why did the SEC end their multi-year investigation of Mamma.com Inc. for alleged securities laws violations days before interviewing present and former Mamma.com Inc. executives about this matter? Was the timing a coincidence? We think not. Any inquiries respecting this release should be directed to Stephen Best at Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP (202) 346-8735. _______________________________________________ This piece was originally published on Mark's blog Blog Maverick and is posted on DMW with the author's permission. Mark's bio can be viewed here. The views expressed in this post are the author’s own, and do not represent the views of Digital Media Wire. Image by quinnums
|
Upcoming DMW Events
Nov. 18-19, 2009 | New York, NY www.televisionconference.com
December 8, 2009 | Santa Monica, CA www.lafilmconference.com
January 8, 2010 | Las Vegas, NV www.digitalmediainsider.com Events Calendar Submit a Speaker To receive event updates & announcements:
Recent comments
NavigationUser loginAds |
Daily Newsletter and NetworkingLatest Top Stories
DMW Widget - Grab it and embed!Latest Briefly Noted
PollOther Ads |
Comments
well, doesn't really matter mark...
Seems pretty clear to me
That's often the case with insider trading - you know, the telephone call, the tidbit of information, then the quick call to the broker. Then when the news enters the public arena it's like "Hey, I guess I was just lucky with that trade..."
Sorry Mark, on the facts so far, you deserve to lose this one.
Post new comment