Analysis: Jay Leno And The End Of The Mass Broadcasting Era

Authored by Rohit Bhargava on September 14, 2009 - 11:01am.

On September 14th at 10pm EST in the US (tonight), a new experiment in television will take place that is both a sign of the times, and a quiet revolution in the way that broadcast TV (and perhaps media itself) will work. The Jay Leno Show will debut at its new time slot of 10pm - a full hour and a half earlier than he used to be on when doing The Tonight Show - and aim to reach people "exhausted by kids, work and so on" as he has said more than once in interviews. The significance of this moment is not so much about the change in time - but in what types of programs he will be up against.

The 10pm time slot on the other big American television networks (ABC, FOX, CBS) are filled with expensive to produce dramas like CSI and Private Practice. Over the last five years, more and more of these types of programs have been moving to cable television channels like Bravo, FX, Lifetime, HBO and others. Cable offers broader creative control, more niche audiences and the creative license that producers of those programs often seek. Perhaps most importantly, DVRs and Tivo have been allowing a higher and higher percentage of Americans to skip the ads - reducing the effectiveness of television advertising and steering brand advertisers to consider spending money elsewhere.

Put all these pieces together, and you can start to see that the new Jay Leno show is very likely the new model of the broadcast television of the future (as the recent Time magazine cover piece explores). It will be broadcast live 46 weeks a year (as opposed to the usual scripted drama's 22 weeks) and will have a built in focus on current events that makes it much more unlikely that people will record it to watch later. In other words, if you want to see something current that is on RIGHT NOW, Leno will be there five days a week.

If it works, this experiment may demonstrate that the future of broadcast television may be all about live events such as the Leno program, some types of reality television, national and local news, and sporting events. Scripted dramas and comedies, on the other hand, may continue their move to cable television. Ultimately this may mean that live events become the only thing that can still truly attract mass audiences enough to keep the broadcast TV channels afloat. But here's the most interesting part: one of the best things about social media is that it is focused on real time collaboration and sharing. If the future of broadcast is pointing towards live moments, then the intersection between television and social media may be one of the most interesting stories of the future. I, for one, will be watching that collision closely. 

Rohit Bhargava

This piece was originally published on Rohit's blog, Influential Marketing, and is posted on DMW with the author's permission. 

 

tags: Video | Marketing | Advertising | TV | TiVo | DVR | ABC | CBS | NBC | Jay Leno |

Comments

Well written and truthful.

Well written and truthful. I'd say the era of these types of programs are slowly coming back again after a huge dry spell for many years.

Thanks for the insights. I

Thanks for the insights. I think you make some interesting points. Here are a few other points: The article says Leno hopes to reach "people "exhausted by kids, work and so on"" in part because he'll be serving up timely, topical issues. While that might be his aim, my view is that it won't last more than a year because: A) He's just not that funny; and B) People get so much timely, topical news that watching Leno will just be duplicate and boring to people who are "exhausted." I agree with the article on the point that TV will serve up more live broadcasts, but they'll have to be good to survive, and I don't believe Leno is good (that was my point when we talked--it was specific to Leno). I do think the point about cost is a very interesting and good one--Newspapers have already gone through this shift, as news has gone from newspapers to the Internet, leaving advertising in newspapers a much diminished market. So the same might happen with network/cable TV as the article suggests, but it might happen in a different way because the media are very different. The article stops too soon, though (except for the last line of it): People have been talking about "convergence" for a long time, and those arguments suggest "TV with commercials" as we know it is being more influenced by the Internet than it is by TV networks. People forget that TV is a medium as well as the message that it sends. And if people don't like the medium (i.e. being tied to a TV anchored in their playroom or where-ever) and they don't like the message (i.e. advertisements while they're watching a show), then the game is up for TV. The current/future factors driving media today are: Portability (like a laptop), personalization (like how you personalize your google or yahoo or shopping pages), and real-time (like near instantaneous information from anywhere in the world, anytime). TV doesn't offer these.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.